Christopher Kaczor, The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. Author(s): David DeGrazia. Source: Ethics, Vol. , No. Buy The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice (Routledge Annals of Bioethics) 1 by Christopher Kaczor (ISBN. The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human. Life, and the Question of Justice . Christopher Kaczor. Loyola Marymount University. Follow this and additional.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||7 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||4.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.77 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kaczor presents a powerful argument as to why this is so.
“The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question o” by Christopher Kaczor
Kaczor shows that the unborn kacozr a human being, argues against all of the common “personhood” objections including sentience, viability, desires, consciousness, etc. In Defense of Eating Meat.
Write a customer review. Bertha Alvarez Manninen – – Hypatia 28 3: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate.
Kaczor’s strongest argument appeals to what he describes as the orientation of all human beings toward freedom and reason. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. It was a very interesting read, and a concept that I hadn’t given much thought to before. In this, Kaczor deals with many of the objections that will often be raised up against the pro-life movement.
He attempts to provide a systematic defense against arguments in favor of abortion, and overall it’s a pleasure to read. Answering the arguments of defenders of abortion, this book provides reasoned justification for the view that all intentional abortions are morally wrong and that doctors and nurses who object to abortion should not be forced to act against their consciences.
On the other hand, if our orientation toward freedom and reason depends upon factors other than our genetic code, then we can retain a value-based criterion for the right to life, but anencephalic human beings, the severely retarded and severely demented, and those who have suffered the fate of being rendered irreversibly unconscious will lack the right to life.
Christian Munthe – manuscript. Kaczor’s final chapter looks at the question of artificial wombs. For example, when arguing against the “personhood from desires” argument, Kaczor notes that in Buddhism, the entire purpose of life is it have no more desires and ultimately, end up in a state of desierlessness not a word.
An Essay in Moral and Legal Philosophy. Therefore, the human genetics criterion divorces Kaczor’s criterion of the right to life from the fact that as humans we typically value freedom and reason. A successful argument will not rest on obscuring this distinction. He regularly interacts with defenders of abortion and for those concerned that this is just a religious rant, he does it without appealing to the arguments of a particular religion.
Updates and Revisions to the Second Edition include: Furthermore, it is a nice summary of the best of the recent literature critical of brain essentialism. Sign in to use this feature.
Follow the Author
Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. I highly recommend it.
Jukka Varelius – – Neuroethics Browse Results 6 1: I would strongly encourage anyone who is interested in the subject to read it and to study it. It is very current, scholarly, and detailed. Alward – – Journal of Medical Ethics 28 2: His arguments are scientific and philosophical. Of course, Kaczor wants to make sure these actions are not done for frivolous reasons and does criticize that too often abortions take place for those reasons.
The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice
Kaczor’s book on abortion is a rather surprising one, and that’s a good kaczorr. Reproductive Autonomy and the Ethics of Abortion. The difficulty that Kaczor discusses concerns giving an adequate and non-arbitrary account of the capacity to exhibit psychological traits that, on ksczor one hand, excludes fetuses and, on the other hand, includes all of those individuals past infancy who have the right to life. Andrews – – Bioethics 24 9: See all 9 reviews.
Giubilini – – Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 1: However, Kaczor offers a thoughtful discussion abortioh which he questions whether such abirtion of being a person succeed in including everyone in the class of human beings after the time of infancy. We can distinguish between those who are directly and those who are indirectly rational animals. Kamm – – Oxford University Press. Christopher Kaczor Loyola Marymount University.
A Critique of Alison M. Set up a giveaway. Although some of these analyses can be found elsewhere in the extensive literature on the abortion issue, Kaczor’s book contains the most complete, the most penetrating and the most up-to-date set of critiques of the arguments for abortion choice presently available.
Sign in to use this feature. On the other hand, this claim has been subjected to two major criticisms, both set out clearly by Peter Singer over thirty years ago in Practical Ethicsand both discussed by Kaczor. Defusing Thomson’s Violinist Analogy. Essential Readings for the Nonbeliever. A Reply to Kaczor. To adopt another use of ‘person’ for the architecture of one’s book appears to build a bias into one’s analysis. I’d like to read this book on Kindle Don’t have a Kindle? Eethics Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life.
Routledge Annals of Bioethics Paperback: Kaczor is not one of those who think calm, rational argument is useless.